<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>finishingmycoffee.com &#187; feminism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://finishingmycoffee.com/tag/feminism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://finishingmycoffee.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 19:57:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dollhouse: The Best Show On Television</title>
		<link>http://finishingmycoffee.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-the-best-show-on-television/</link>
		<comments>http://finishingmycoffee.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-the-best-show-on-television/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>misgatos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dollhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eliza Dushku]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joss Whedon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misgatos.wordpress.com/?p=727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[C and I have been watching Joss Whedon's (Buffy, Firefly, the bat episode of The Office) Dollhouse all season. It was slow to take hold, but the most recent episode was so unabashedly brilliant that if you haven't been watching, I can only urge you to spend this weekend catching up. It's the best show [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_729" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><img class="size-full wp-image-729" title="dollhouse" src="http://misgatos.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/dollhouse_l1.jpg" alt="Do dolls dream of electric sheep?" width="400" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Do dolls dream of electric sheep?</p></div>
<p>C and I have been watching Joss Whedon's (<em><a href="http://www.hulu.com/buffy-the-vampire-slayer">Buffy</a>, <a href="http://www.hulu.com/firefly">Firefly</a></em>, <a href="http://www.aintitcool.com/node/31591">the bat episode of <em>The Office</em></a>) <em><a href="http://www.hulu.com/dollhouse">Dollhouse</a></em> all season. It was slow to take hold, but the most recent episode was so unabashedly brilliant that if you haven't been watching, I can only urge you to spend this weekend catching up. It's the <strong>best show on television</strong>*.</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-style:italic;">Dollhouse</span> is . . . a show about consent. It's built around an organization - the titular Dollhouse - which erases volunteers' personalities and memories and renders them childlike and passive, in order to implant them with new, built-to-order personalities custom made for wealthy clients who wish to order the "perfect" person for a specific job.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Dollhouse</em> is <a href="http://www.hulu.com/dollhouse">available on Hulu</a> and, if you don't act soon, it'll likely be canceled. Smart science fiction, doomed to air on Friday evenings? Go figure.</p>
<p>Once you've watched a little bit, <a href="http://tigerbeatdown.blogspot.com/2009/04/dollhouse-joss-whedon-and-strange-and.html">read this analysis</a> of the show. The author has put a great deal of thought into their post, and does an excellent job delving into the depths of the metaphor.</p>
<blockquote><p><span id="more-730"></span>Also, several Dolls have been used for sex by Dollhouse employees, sometimes with the illusion of consent in place and sometimes not.</p>
<p>So, at this point, people were like, "um, is noted feminist auteur Joss Whedon aware that he is making a show about forced prostitution and rape?" Whedon's politics have repeatedly been called into question, and usually for damn good reason. (Here is the thing about doing stuff that appeals to politically engaged audiences: you cannot fuck up politically and have people fail to notice or just go, "oh well, par for the course, ha ha ha!" You get yelled at. Sorry. Deal.) <span style="font-style:italic;">Dollhouse</span>, in particular, had the potential to be hugely offensive. Here is the thing: Whedon, unlike most folks and many feminist or progressive-identified dudes, seems to actually listen when he is called out and to improve his work accordingly. In the case of <span style="font-style:italic;">Dollhouse,</span> I think he is doing smarter work than he ever was. Getting smarter about oppression, I would submit to you, requires making the visible manifestations of it or metaphors for it much, much uglier.</p>
<p>The answer to whether Joss Whedon and his showrunners know how rape-culturey the entire <span style="font-style:italic;">Dollhouse </span>concept is would seem to be, at this point, a big huge Yes. The Dollhouse is a giant metaphor, not only for rape culture, but for patriarchy and oppression at large: even the boy dolls are girls, stripped of agency or access to power and cast in pre-defined roles to fulfill the fantasies of the folks who are actually in charge. When they have sex, they aren't consenting - they've been made to think that they are consenting, by being made to think that they are the people who would consent to such things. They exist either in a state of infantilization and non-personhood (in which they are "cared for" by people who have a vested interest in continuing to use them) or implanted with false consciousness in which they are not aware of what's being done to them. I mean, <span style="font-style:italic;">false consciousness: </span>Whedon's metaphors, they are rarely subtle. Their reactions to learning this, when they "wake up" (which Whedon has shown them doing, albeit briefly) are horror, disgust, and rage at how deeply they've been violated.</p></blockquote>
<p>What else can I say? The special effects are smart, subtle takes on what will likely be available in the next few years. If you liked <em>Ghost in the Shell</em>, <em>The Matrix</em>, <em>BSG</em>, <em>Twilight</em> <em>Blade Runner</em> or <em>Harry Potter</em>, you'll like <em>Dollhouse</em>.</p>
<p>It's not for kids but if you're looking for smart entertainment, this is the show for you.</p>
<p>* <em>Battlestar Galactica</em> and <em>Friday Night Lights</em> are over. <em>LOST</em> is fun, but is so far from it's conclusion that it's level of commentary, it's meaning, are still unknown variables. <em>The Daily Show</em> and <em>Colbert</em> don't count -- they're news.</p>
<p><em>Via <a href="http://robotwisdom2.blogspot.com/2009/10/god-of-old-testament-is-depiction-of.html">robot wisdom</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finishingmycoffee.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-the-best-show-on-television/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On The Presidential Campaigns</title>
		<link>http://finishingmycoffee.com/2008/09/11/on-the-presidential-campaigns/</link>
		<comments>http://finishingmycoffee.com/2008/09/11/on-the-presidential-campaigns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>misgatos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[npr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Gibson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Big Lebowski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misgatos.wordpress.com/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm guessing you all caught the Charlie "let's grill Obama about nonsense instead of anything that matters" Gibson's "exclusive interview" with Palin - the first questions she's fielded since her nomination (just amazing... how much cramming does she need to do?!). I know the average citizen doesn't know what the Bush Doctrine refers to, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm guessing you all caught the Charlie "let's grill Obama about nonsense instead of anything that matters" Gibson's "exclusive interview" with Palin - the first questions she's fielded since her nomination (just amazing... how much cramming does she need to do?!). I know the average citizen doesn't know what the Bush Doctrine refers to, but shouldn't a candidate for Vice President have some idea?</p>
<p>Copied below, in chronological order starting with the most recent, are links to some of the finest gems I've been able to unearth from the vast wastes of the Internets. If you're like me, they'll be a cool drink of refreshing reason, with a chaser of sickening ohmygodOrwell'sfutureisheretoday.</p>
<div dir="ltr">The article on feminism, a topic that I think is usually way too academic, wordy, impractical and over-dramatic (yes, yes, I know - hilariously inappropriate and mysoganistic comments &lt;tips hat and takes a bow&gt;) was possibly the most educational thing I've read in weeks, as it clearly and consisely articulates what I've been feeling while untangling the knot of confusion and disgust that's been roiling around my insides since Palin's nomination.</p>
<p>Any thoughts? Love to hear em.<span id="more-213"></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<div><a title="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/11/14119/1262/889/595083" href="http://www.new.facebook.com/share_redirect.php?h=39568f200a45db2905d278a69eb319c6&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailykos.com%2Fstory%2F2008%2F9%2F11%2F14119%2F1262%2F889%2F595083&amp;sid=30924641315" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal scrubs their article on Palin</a></div>
<div>
<div>
<blockquote>
<div>At a rally today, Sen. McCain again asserted that Sen. Obama has requested nearly a billion in earmarks. In fact, the Illinois senator requested $311 million last year, according to the Associated Press, and none this year.</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<div><span>The WSJ changes one paragraph to completely distort the facts. McCain continues to LIE about earmarks requested by Obama. Truth = $311M last year, $0 this year. By contrast, Palin has requested the most earmarks per capita in the nation.</span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div><a title="http://www.slate.com/id/2199811/pagenum/all/#page_start" href="http://www.new.facebook.com/share_redirect.php?h=aba6c0e633eed1be60bc4a7d68835db5&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slate.com%2Fid%2F2199811%2Fpagenum%2Fall%2F%23page_start&amp;sid=35241059574" target="_blank">Walter Sobchak, Neocon: THE PRESCIENT POLITICS OF THE BIG LEBOWSKI.</a></div>
<div>Says I: Excellent academic article about The Big Lebowski, via George. Only thing I didn't like is that the author's a condescending bastard. Umm, we got this, jerk: "it becomes clear that appreciating Walter is essential to understanding what the Coen brothers are up to in this movie, which is slyer, more political, and more prescient than many of its fans have recognized."</div>
<div><span><br />
Says my friend George: "Someone should tell him that to an Achiever, the prescient political undertones are obvious."</p>
<p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<div><a title="http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2008/09/11/zombie_feminism/?source=newsletter" href="http://www.new.facebook.com/share_redirect.php?h=0cb8ce6fbb6c50a8c80dc63514db01c1&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.salon.com%2Fmwt%2Ffeature%2F2008%2F09%2F11%2Fzombie_feminism%2F%3Fsource%3Dnewsletter&amp;sid=30758821738" target="_blank">Sarah Palin, feminism, 2008 election<br />
</a></div>
<div>
<div>
<blockquote>
<div>How did Sarah Palin become a symbol of women's empowerment? And how did I, a die-hard feminist, end up terrified at the idea of a woman in the White House?</div>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><span>In this "Handmaid's Tale"-inflected universe, femininity is worshipped but females will be denied rights. According to Donnie Deutsch, Palin does what Hillary Clinton did not: "put a skirt on." "I want her watching my kids," says Deutsch. "I want her laying next to me in bed."</span></div>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><span>In this strange new pro-woman tableau, feminism -- a word that is being used all over the country with regard to Palin's potential power -- means voting for someone who would limit reproductive control, access to healthcare and funding for places like Covenant House Alaska, an organization that helps unwed teen mothers. It means cheering someone who allowed women to be charged for their rape kits while she was mayor of Wasilla, who supports the teaching of creationism alongside evolution, who has inquired locally about the possibility of using her position to ban children's books from the public library, who does not support the teaching of sex education.</span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div><a title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122108935141721343.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" href="http://www.new.facebook.com/share_redirect.php?h=96c0999a0c2c00febd8b6cfadc73948d&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB122108935141721343.html%3Fmod%3Dgooglenews_wsj&amp;sid=30408591385" target="_blank">Obama Can't Win Against Palin</a></div>
<div>(An <span>op-ed by the puppeteer himself, Karl Rove.</span>)</div>
<div>
<div>
<blockquote>
<div>Of all the advantages Gov. Sarah Palin has brought to the GOP ticket, the most important may be that she has gotten into Barack Obama's head. How else to explain Sen. Obama's decision to go one-on-one against "Sarah Barracuda," captain of the Wasilla High state basketball champs?</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div><a title="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94332508#share" href="http://www.new.facebook.com/share_redirect.php?h=e713518f6f88e27665177265a5c5509b&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.npr.org%2Ftemplates%2Fstory%2Fstory.php%3FstoryId%3D94332508%23share&amp;sid=38154690201" target="_blank">Teen Sex, Sex Education And Sarah Palin </a></div>
<div>
<div>Gov. Sarah Palin has been a strong supporter of programs that advocate abstinence until marriage, and she also opposes explicit sex education. Alaska's law is silent on these issues, however, and it provides no specific funding for sex education in the schools.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><a title="http://community.adn.com/adn/node/130537" href="http://www.new.facebook.com/share_redirect.php?h=4345b1e764eb57eb819c3599f2996be7&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.adn.com%2Fadn%2Fnode%2F130537&amp;sid=38667903216" target="_blank">Alaska Politics: I have known Sarah since 1992...</a></div>
<blockquote>
<div>The e-mail below has been bouncing around the Internet since Sunday. It was written by Anne Kilkenny of Wasilla - stay-at-home mom, letter-to-the-editor writer and longtime watcher of Valley politics. She's a registered Democrat. She was one of the delegates to the <strong><a href="http://dwb.adn.com/front/story/4737574p-4685165c.html" target="_blank">Conference of Alaskans</a></strong> in Fairbanks back in 2004. Her bio from the conference is <strong><a href="http://www.sitnews.us/0104news/013004/013004_coa_delegate.html" target="_blank">here</a></strong>.</div>
<p>She e-mailed this letter over the weekend to family and friends Outside, and (despite her request not to post it) it went viral on the Internet very quickly, showing up on blogs and <strong><a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/09/an-wasillan-on.html" target="_blank">Web sites</a></strong> all over. Since then, Kilkenny has been inundated with phone calls and e-mails. She said she stayed up until 3 a.m. last night answering e-mails, and found nearly 400 new ones waiting when she logged on this morning.</p>
<p>It's posted here with her permission.</p></blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finishingmycoffee.com/2008/09/11/on-the-presidential-campaigns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

