Public Transport: Melbourne Versus Sydney
My great friend Brett absolutely kills it in an op-ed on Sydney's lagging transportation system in today's Sydney Morning Herald. George Carlin and David Simon would both be proud.
Even Sydney's overwhelming successes, roads like the Eastern Distributor and M2 that remove thousands of cars from local streets, were met with fierce opposition when proposed.
It's our city's favourite sport - trying to stop progress.
The sad reality is that successive governments have been able to get away with failing to act because noisy action groups have put themselves before the common good. Too often the government has paid heed to them instead of the broader community interest.
Only in NSW are transport plans announced in the morning papers and killed by 9am the same day. Taken out by a combination of feckless ministers, furious talkback radio hosts, and everyone playing the great Sydney pastime of, "not in my backyard".
The looming transport blueprint will, hopefully, provide Sydneysiders the chance to grow up. They should look at what the plan contains and discuss it in a calm rational way rather than the default position of outrage that too often masquerades as policy debate in this city.
Building infrastructure to benefit the whole city will entail individual losers. It's a fact of life we need to accept. For too long on too many projects we've let the noisy minority stop progress for the silent majority. Until we have a government and a community prepared to deal with the difficult choices - and compromises - involved in all major infrastructure projects, it will be easier for governments of all persuasions to do nothing.
Unfortunately, while I'm waiting for the plan to be released, I feel like the starter of a car race: Sydneysiders start your whingeing.
via Stuck at a bus stop with nothing but NIMBYs in sight | Brett Gale.
Published In Today’s SF Chronicle
Privacy concern in Google Voice call recording
Monstrous privacy concerns loom: What information will Google collect from the calls it connects, and what will it do with that information? Google's privacy policy says it will store and maintain recorded conversations. Is it preserving the numbers called, the duration of the call and even the name and address of the person the Google Voice user called? When I call a person who uses Google Voice or he or she calls me, what control do I have over what information Google collects about me or about how Google will use that data? Apparently none.
Many thanks to Prof. Tuthill for the opportunity, collaboration and guidance. I'd never shopped an idea around to different publications -- the entire process was interesting.
Feature v. Perceived Value-addition
My television has a feature I hadn’t seen before on a television before I bought it: Bluetooth. The television has a Bluetooth receiver, and you can send it photos and display them on the screen. That’s it. Anybody who has used Bluetooth for anything more than hands-free will understand why this is ridiculous. Not only is it absurd to view photos by sending them one-by-one to a television over a medium that has throughput that barely rivals 1990’s ISDN lines, but it’s even more ridiculous once you realize the TV has no storage. The picture is gone when you don’t want to look at it anymore.
This is a feature? No: this is perceived value-addition. For people who don’t know any better, this seems like a wonderful solution. But a solution to what? I know I didn’t have the problem that I wanted to look at crappy-quality photos from my phone’s camera on my television’s non-persistent screen.
$1 Million Per Year To Kill The Public Option
Yesterday, five Democratic United States Senators Max Baucus (D-Mont), Kent Conrad (D-ND), Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark), Bill Nelson (D-Fla) and Tom Carper (D-Del) voted against the a proposal to put a government administered public option in the health reform bill that will come out of the Senate Finance Committee.
Americans support the notion of a government administered health insurance plan by a margin of 65% to 26%. According to the same poll, people who identify themselves as Democrats favor the public option by a margin of 81% to 12%. That’s nearly 7 to 1 in favor of, yet the representatives of the Democrat party in the Senate Finance Committee only voted for the public option at a ratio of 8 to 5. Perhaps the most interesting number revealed by this poll is that Republican voters favor the public option 47% to 42%.
So why can’t the people’s representatives in Washington get behind the public option? Specifically, why can’t these five Democrats get behind it when 81% of people in their party want the option?
Look at the amount of money the health industry has pumped into these five Democrat’s coffers:
- Max Baucus got $7,734,102,
- Blanche Lincoln received $4,190,592,
- Ken Conrad took in $3,287,891,
- Bill Nelson was given $2,414,895
- Tom Carper accepted $1,592,380 from health industry interests.
If money is the reason these five Democrats rejected the public option, then it only took a little over 19 million dollars over 20 years to buy the five votes the health insurance industry needed to kill any meaningful reform to their industry.
33
Today I reach the age of Jesus.
By then, he'd already walked on water and cured lepers. For most of us, that would have made for a pretty stellar C.V. ... but he was just getting warmed up.
Me? Not only have I not matched him, but I've yet to pull off either trick.
Lots of catching up to do. In the meantime, maybe I should stop having my portraits painted to include halos and a heavenly light emanating from my person. At least for a little while.
Teabaggers Love Government Aid After Flood
As you may have seen in the newspapers, radio and the intertubes, much of the state of Georgia is underwater. People have lost their homes, cars and other precious things (like children and loved ones, but I know those are not quite as important to you folks…). But foolishly, they are looking to the Government for help. Starting with our Governor Sonny ‘rugged individualist’ Perdue, they are now calling on the Government to help. That’s where we need you John Galts and teabaggers who really, really want the Government out of all our lives.
Daily Kos: Calling All John Galts in Georgia
F.C.C. Chairman Seeks to Protect Free Flow of Internet Data
F.C.C. Chairman Seeks to Protect Free Flow of Internet Data - NYTimes.com
The Fruity Tree

The Fruity Tree

